Why Do We Mourn Hollywood (Heath Ledger)?

Jan 28, 2008 3:45 PM

hollywood_sign.jpg

Why do we mourn Hollywood? Thanks to all the media whore outlits, it has gotten to the point where writing about Heath Ledger's passing is beyond trite. Unfortunately, this whorishness will continue at least until the Oscar's are over, where it is sure to be hitting you over the head until you have a full on concussion. In all seriousness, however, there is one aspect about the whole tragedy that many of us, heretofore, have yet to deconstruct. Why were we so genuinely shocked when we first heard the news? Why did we feel some genuine component of sorrow? Whether out of shame, obliviousness, or fear, many of us have not answered this question.

Most of us never knew Heath Ledger, and yet we somehow felt like we did. His life was anything but heroic, and yet it commanded so much more than any of the lives of our fallen heroes in Iraq. And his death was anything but honorable; it was either voluntary, or maybe ridiculously, involuntary.

So again, why the feelings? A lot of sheepish insecure people would crucify you just for admitting such a thing out loud. Those types of people want a black and white answer for everything, or want to cease on an opportunity to demagogically gain the upper moral hand. But the world is not so simple, calculus involving only the variables troops, Heath, and some output of sorrow, neglects the lurking variables and will invariably lead you to folly.

What did Heath mean to us? Is he more of an idea to us than a person? Was he democratically elected by us, the fans, to represent us and our culture? Or is the vicarious nature of the mind such that the proscenium between reality and illusion is diaphanous?

Heath meant nothing to us in the flesh and blood, but the concept of Heath meant very much. This dichotomy is one many people can't or won't accept. We didn't feel sad for Heath's passing as a mortal, how could we we didn't know him, we felt sad for him as an immortal. Like it or not, Heath was naturalized and popularly elected by all of us. Each one of us had our own reasons, some felt stronger about his election than others, but in the end, Heath won a place in our minds by triumphing in the agon of all thoughts. Why he triumphed, is something each of us have to answer for ourselves.

And let us not regret or be abashed by Heath's residence in our mind. He occupies a spandrel that will always exist and is a part of being human. This space is not far from dreams and hope. Let's just make sure this space continues to be inhabited by Heaths and not Paris or Britney.

To contact the author of this post, email guestofaguest@gmail.com

Mike Hunt

January 29, 2008

2:00am

Guys, I happen to fall upon your site from time to time, and am happy to admit that I am a moderate fan, but your most recent post cannot go without comment. Mr Hunsecker’s piece must be a flippant take on the Classic Tragedy; “Or is the vicarious nature of the mind such that the proscenium between reality and illusion is diaphanous?” is one of the most conceited, pompous lines I have ever had the displeasure reading – EVER!!! These sort of comments are surely more appropriate for your obviously tortured Ivy League Art and Drama professors, rather than what seems to me a loyal readership, more accustomed to “Fucktards” and the superlative “Guido Guidbag Of The Week”. Pure Gems!!! And while I do certainly appreciate some of the New Authors' past pieces, and markedly lofty ideals, lets leave the Greek Theatre out of it, sometimes less IS more. Keep up the great work though, kindest regards Mike  

Stanley Stuyvesant

January 29, 2008

4:00am

Mike, while we understand your current displeasure with J.J., we cannot sympathize with you too much because we have to work with the aged bastard! J.J. is a dinosaur, trying to mold to the new medium of blogging, while fighting off extinction and the forces of natural selection. We are working with him, so bear with him, as he lightens up his commentary, and switches from Greeks to Guidos (at least in spirit). That being said, we think an infusion of "lofty ideals" and pointed commentary does a mind good once in a while, so expect to be "enlightened" in a pompous nature once in a while. Cheers, Stanley  

bird

January 30, 2008

8:36pm

While this is an obviously touchy subject, I think you bring up a valid point. Perhaps focusing on surface news events that involve celebrities are our culture's way of blocking out reality? While Heath Ledger's death is an obvious tragedy (young baby left behind, promising career now gone) we should reevaluate the emphasis that is directed at tabloid journalism.  

GUEST COMMENT
You can comment as a guest here.
REGISTER
You can register for an account here.
LOGIN