La Esquina Shut Down, Is A "Danger To Life"

May 10, 2010 2:08 PM

New York's Department of Buildings paid a surprise visit to Soho's La Esquina this morning that led to a shutdown of the popular Mexican restaurant. The reason: La Esquina's "secret" basement bar and eatery is a fire hazard.

An employee stood guard by the restaurant's ground floor entrance on Kenmare Street explaining what she said was the inaccurate violation and urging would-be customers to sign a petition in the restaurant's favor. Signs posted by management promised the joint would be up and running in a few days. But intimidating Buildings Department notices suggested an uphill battle.

One "Vacate" sign warned that:

"Conditions in this premises are imminently perilous to life. This premises has been vacated and reentry is prohibited until such conditions have been eliminated to the satisfaction of the department."

Another leaflet went into specifics, citing the cellar portion of the establishment (which also includes a humble taqueria on Kenmare and a more casual sit-down restaurant on Lafayette) as the source of the issue:

"This order is issued because there is imminent danger to life or public safety or safety of the occupants or to property, in that at cellar level arranged for over 284 occupants with wood combustible ceilings and inadequate egress (illegally Egress through intervening spaces) on 1st floor."

And that doesn't even mention the fiery tequila and habanero peppers!

Those "intervening spaces" sound like the labyrinthine entrance to the basement area, which includes a cool-affirming detour through a ratty kitchen and stairwell and was a big part of La Esquina's appeal. Again, the employee insisted the building was up to code and that the violation would be overturned.

Meanwhile, she was nice enough to direct burrito-craving passersby to the Calexico cart down the street.

To contact the author of this post, email guestofaguest@gmail.com

anonymous

May 12, 2010

1:22pm

This is really sad, L O V E Esquina! But maybe these basements and cellar deals are a little more dangerous then anyone thought. Seems many times these operators chose basements and cellars because that's all they can afford, not Serge of course. But who wants worry about partying in a space they can't get out of when there is a fire and find out they're literally trapped inside? It kind of ruins all the fun. A few martini's and a pair of 5" Choo Choo's later do you really want to find out there is literally no way out because it's built against fire codes? And while everyone is so busy brutally ravaging the neighbors it seems they will go up in flames with you. This isn't even a logical argument when people get killed in fires when the doors and egress aren't up to code. Just sayin...  

anonymous

May 12, 2010

1:53pm

Dead on #1, if they can't afford the real estate chances are they couldn't afford to build out the spaces. If they're hiding behind LLC's or go bankrupt like Bijiox are they even insured? I mean what if they have a fire, your trapped inside with no way out and your gorgeous face requires surgery after surgery only to find out these same operators who are cited again and again cared as much about you as they did about these codes? Do you really want to take Solich's word for it who writes these stories bashing the neighbors for the price of admission when it's devoid of the obvious? Seems these neighbors are vested because they will go up in flames with you.  

GUEST COMMENT
You can comment as a guest here.
REGISTER
You can register for an account here.
LOGIN